Swenson v. Emerson Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Commission's reporting rules constitute \a reasonable interpretation of [the Act] in light of the language of the disclosure provision and the structure and purposes of [the Act].\
• interpretive rule given authoritative effect if it is “permissible gloss on the statute,” but may not contradict plain meaning of statute or legislative history
• when deciding persuasive value of agency interpretation, courts consider consistency with earlier and later pronouncements
• weight given to agency’s interpretation of statute depends upon thoroughness of consideration, validity of reasoning, consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and other factors giving power to persuade

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).