· 2/26/1980
Whirlpool Corp. v. Marshall
Citations
- 445 U.S. 1
- 100 S. Ct. 883
- 63 L. Ed. 2d 154
- 1980 U.S. LEXIS 81
- 8 OSHC (BNA) 1001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that OSHA was passed with the intention of deterring the occurrence of occupational deaths and serious injuries
- “safety legislation is to be liberally construed to effectuate the congressional purpose”
- interpretative rules are subject to plenary judicial review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.