Sweeney v. General Printing, Inc.
Citations
- 210 A.D.2d 865
- 621 N.Y.S.2d 132
- 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting summary judgment where “there is no evidence that the latter [injuries] were caused by a separate and distinct disease process from the former”
- evolution of “ ‘low grade tumors’ ” into “more invasive tumors” necessitating bladder removal held not “separate and distinct disease process”
- “separate and distinct disease processes may constitute different injuries” and give rise to two causes of action
- “[T]he phrase ‘discovery of the injury’ necessarily contemplates something less than full awareness that one has been damaged as a result of exposure to a particular toxic substance.”
- ʺ[T]he phrase ʹdiscovery of the injuryʹ necessarily contemplates something less than full awareness that one has been damaged as a result of exposure to a particular toxic substance.ʺ
- ʺ[T]he phrase ʹdiscovery of the injuryʹ necessarily contemplates something less than full awareness that one has been damaged as a result of exposure to a particular toxic substance.ʺ
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yesawich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Giordano v. MARKET AMERICA, INC.Second Circuit· 2010-03-17· cited 130×
- Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2011-05-05· cited 82×
- Markut v. Verizon New York Inc.Second Circuit· 2014-07-10· cited 40×
- Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetD. Massachusetts· 1999-08-16· cited 35×
- Golod v. Hoffman La RocheS.D. New York· 1997-05-20· cited 29×
- Braune v. Abbott LaboratoriesE.D. New York· 1995-08-16· cited 24×
- In Re Breast Implant CasesS.D. New York· 1996-10-23· cited 20×
- Pompa v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-10-21· cited 20×
- Martin Griffin and Denise Griffin v. Garratt-Callahan CompanySecond Circuit· 1996-01-18· cited 18×
- Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-04-07· cited 18×
- Krogmann v. Glens Falls City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-07-24· cited 16×
- Germantown Central School District v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-06-06· cited 15×
- Dabb v. NYNEX Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-06-18· cited 14×
- Annunziato v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-09-30· cited 13×
- Seekings v. Jamestown Public School SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-02-02· cited 9×
- Whitney v. Agway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-04-17· cited 9×
- Hedlund v. County of TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-01-30· cited 6×
- Humphreys v. HumphreysE.D. New York· 1997-01-04· cited 5×
- Rosner v. Mira, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-03-24· cited 5×
- Wetherill v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-03-14· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1993-06-15· cited 99×
- Fusaro v. Porter-Hayden Co.New York Supreme Court· 1989-11-29· cited 36×
- Johnson v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-16· cited 13×
- Fusaro v. Porter-Hayden Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-02-07· cited 11×
- Michael v. Ametelco, Inc.New York Supreme Court· 1991-02-14· cited 9×
- Michael v. Eastern Alloys, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-07-12· cited 7×
- Goyette v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-05-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.