Golod v. Hoffman La Roche

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding an expert because his theory did “not constitute ‘scientific knowledge’ within the meaning of Daubert. Instead, it is, at most, scientifically-grounded speculation: an untested and potentially untestable hypothesis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).