Veterans Claims· 12/2/1999
Swanson v. West
Citations
- 13 Vet. App. 197
- 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1358
- 1999 WL 1081270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissal ensured that Board decision and underlying regional office decision would have no preclusive effect in adjudication of any subsequent accrued-benefits claim derived from veteran’s entitlement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holdaway, Nebeker, Steinberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 923×
- Vda de Landicho v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-09-23· cited 272×
- Zevalkink v. BrownFederal Circuit· 1996-12-17· cited 263×
- Robinette v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-07-14· cited 149×
- Barbara Haines, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsFederal Circuit· 1998-08-24· cited 55×
- Earl A. Humphreys, M.D. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationThird Circuit· 1996-12-09· cited 34×
- Yoma v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-11-01· cited 33×
- Hudgins v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-12-11· cited 25×
- Menken v. AtlantaSupreme Court· 1889-04-18· cited 17×
- American Diamond Rock-Boring v. SheldonSupreme Court· 1888-12-20· cited 13×
- Swanson v. WestVeterans Claims· 1999-06-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.