Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Chatterton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding testimony by internist regarding standard of care for orthopedic surgeon
• holding trial court properly excluded testimony of internist who testified regarding fractures, because expert was not an orthopedist, and did not have experience treating fractures like the one at issue in the case
• holding trial court properly excluded testimony of internist who testified regarding fractures, because expert was not an orthopedist, and did not have experience treating fractures like the one at issue in the case
• internist not qualified as to orthopedic surgery
• internist not qualified as to orthopedic surgery
• internist not qualified as to orthopedic surgery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).