Swan v. Chorpenning
Citations
- 20 Cal. 182
Syllabus
<p>Ant agreement respecting Government contracts to be awarded to the lowest bidder, which tends to deprive the Government of the advantage of competition in the bidding, is unlawful and void.</p> <p>An agreement not to bid upon a contract which is to be awarded to the lowest bidder, and an agreement to withdraw a bid already made, are obnoxious to the same legal objections.</p> <p>S., having put in a bid for carrying the mails over a certain route, agreed with 0. to withdraw his bid and use his influence to induce the Government to give to C. a contract for a longer route, including the one bid upon, on consideration that if C. obtained the contract, S. should have an interest in it, or be paid an equivalent pecuniary compensation: Held, that the contract was void as against public policy.</p>
Judges: Cope, Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jered Contracting Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals· 1968-05-29· cited 144×
- Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1916-01-03· cited 65×
- City of Oakland v. California Construction Co.California Supreme Court· 1940-06-27· cited 34×
- Hoffman v. McMullenNinth Circuit· 1897-10-04· cited 18×
- Conway v. Garden City Paving & Post Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1901-04-18· cited 15×
- In re SalmonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1906-04-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.