Kuhn v. Buhl
Citations
- 251 Pa. 348
- 96 A. 977
- 1916 Pa. LEXIS 473
Syllabus
<p>Contracts — Bids for public franchises — Withdrawal of bids— Contract for withdrawal — Illegality—Evidence—Written contracts —Illegal consideration.</p> <p>1. All agreements for pecuniary considerations to control the business operations of the government are void as against public policy, without reference to the question whether improper means are attempted or used in their execution; such transactions are condemned not so much for the harm done in any particular instance, as because of their general evil public tendency.</p> <p>2. Where any public right, franchise, contract or privilege is to be disposed of by government officials or agents, whether by a public letting, or awarding upon bids, or by the exercise of official discretion without public bids, public policy forbids that one competing applicant, candidate or bidder should contract for the ex-tinguishment of another’s competition, and such contracts, if made, are void.</p> <p>3. Where a written contract is attacked upon the ground that it is offensive to law and violative of public policy, the substance, not the form of the agreement, is looked at; the court will not confine its attention to the mere words in which it is expressed, but evidence aliunde the contract is admissible to prove the illegality of the consideration.</p> <p>4. Where the consideration of a contract is indivisible and a part is illegal, it falls as a whole.</p> <p>5. Under the Acts of Congress of August 18, 1894, c. 301, Sec. 4, 28 U. S. Stat. 372, 422, (2 U. S. Comp. Stat. 1935, Sec. 4685), June 11, 1896, c. 420, 29 U. S. Stat. 413, 434, (2 U. S. Comp. Stat. 1937, Sec. 4686), and March 3, 1901, c. 853, Sec. 3, 31 U. S. Stat. 1133, 1188, (2 U. S. Comp. Stat. 1937, Sec. 4687), relating to the reclamation of desert lands owned by the United States in various states, the state wherein such lands were located, and which accepted the provisions of said acts, were given a measure of control over the reclamation and disposition of such
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding unenforceable as against public policy an agreement between bidders for public lands under which one of them would, in exchange for a fee, withdraw its bid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frazer, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Potter, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon BoroughThird Circuit· 1996-08-14· cited 74×
- Peyton v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-12-30· cited 52×
- Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfee, Rounick, & CabotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-30· cited 40×
- Kribbs v. JACKSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-01-07· cited 35×
- Kemble's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-05-12· cited 35×
- First National Bank v. BaerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-04-09· cited 29×
- Shadis v. BealThird Circuit· 1982-07-20· cited 29×
- New Eastwick Corp. v. Philadelphia Builders Eastwick Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-04-16· cited 26×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2001-04-23· cited 24×
- Deibler v. The Chas. H. Elliott Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-06-27· cited 16×
- Wishnefsky v. RILEY AND FANNELL, PCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-16· cited 15×
- United Security Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-04-18· cited 14×
- Shadis v. BealThird Circuit· 1982-08-04· cited 11×
- Kelly v. BellCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1969-05-15· cited 11×
- Vino 100, LLC v. Smoke On Water, LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-03-30· cited 11×
- Shadis v. BealE.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-08-17· cited 7×
- Niman v. NimanNew York Supreme Court· 1958-11-18· cited 7×
- Spayd v. Ringing Rock LodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-02-28· cited 5×
- Delafant v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-12-08· cited 4×
- Whitaker v. RichmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-12-08· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court· 1875-03-22· cited 272×
- Meguire v. CorwineSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-06-27· cited 41×
- Gibbs v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1874-09-26· cited 33×
- Irvin v. IrvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1895-07-18· cited 26×
- Kilborn v. FieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1875-05-10· cited 25×
- Evans v. DravoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1854-07-01· cited 16×
- Swan v. ChorpenningCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 15×
- Ormerod v. DearmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1882-10-02· cited 11×
- Rumsey v. New York & Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-10-13· cited 8×
- Com. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-05-22· cited 8×
- Hunter v. NolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1872-05-13· cited 5×
- Boyle v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-06-22· cited 5×
- Hyer v. Richmond Traction Co.Fourth Circuit· 1897-05-14· cited 3×
- Cohn v. DaleySupreme Court· 1899-05-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.