Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/19/1902

Swafford v. Templeton

Citations

  • 185 U.S. 487
  • 22 S. Ct. 783
  • 46 L. Ed. 1005
  • 1902 U.S. LEXIS 916

Syllabus

<p>The court below erred in dismissing this action, for want of jurisdiction, as the right which it was claimed had been unlawfully invaded, was one arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and although it has been held that, on error from a state court to this court, where the Federal question asserted to be contained in the record, is manifestly lacking all color of merit,' the writ of .error should be dismissed, that doctrine relates to questions arising on writs of error from state courts, where, aside from the Federal status of the parties to the action, or the inherent' nature of the Federal right which is sought to be vindicated, jurisdiction is to be determined by ascertaining whether the record raises a bona fide Federal question.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that jurisdiction exists where “the very nature of the controversy [is] Federal,” notwithstanding the court’s opinion “as to the want of merit” in the complaint’s allegations that a federal right was violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Swafford v. Templeton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.