Svanoe v. Jurgens
Citations
- 144 Ill. 507
- 33 N.E. 955
Syllabus
<p>1. Agency—agent holds money of his principal in trust. An agent who receives the money of his principal will hold the same in trust, and must be held strictly to the liability of a trustee as between himself and the party for whom he acts. But in the case of ordinary agency no preference is given to such moneys over other claimants against the estate of the debtor.</p> <p>3. Administration of estates—classification of debts — money in hands of an agent. Where an agent of a bank sold its drafts on foreign countries, and received the moneys paid by the purchasers of such drafts, which he was to account for to his principal, and died with money in his hands from such sales unaccounted for: Held, that such money was not held by such agent as “ in trust for any purpose, ” within the meaning of clause 6, of section 70, of chapter 3, Revised Statutes, and that the allowance of a claim for such indebtedness as of the sixth class was erroneous.</p> <p>3. Statute construed. Section 70, of chapter 3, Revised Statutes, giving a preference of claims against estates when they are for money received by the decedent “ in trust for any purpose,” was not intended to embrace all kinds of trusts in the broadest meaning of the term, as including factors, agents, etc. The word “ trust ” is used in the more restricted sense of the term as referring to special trusts, and not those which the law implies from the contract.</p> <p>4. Appeals and writs of error—amount involved. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court, allowing a claim of $1319 against an estate, and directed its payment as a sixth class claim. The estate was able to pay all the sixth class claims, but not the seventh class claims in full, and the administrators appealed to this court: Held, that this court had jurisdiction of the appeal. The right of a party to a judgment in the Appellate Court to bring the case to this court by appeal or writ of error, is not limited by the amount affected by the er
Judges: Magruder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McRedmond v. Estate of MarianelliCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-08-31· cited 22×
- Butts v. Estate of ButtsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-11-25· cited 16×
- Whitbeck v. Estate of RamsayAppellate Court of Illinois· 1897-03-03· cited 8×
- McCutchen v. OsborneSupreme Court of Colorado· 1916-04-15· cited 6×
- Ehrhart v. RorkAppellate Court of Illinois· 1904-06-28· cited 3×
- Adams Express Co. v. OglesbyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1919-10-15· cited 3×
- Blair v. FollansbeeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1896-11-19· cited 2×
- Ford v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois· 1902-01-24· cited 2×
- Spindler v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1934-11-27· cited 2×
- Nels v. ReiterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1939-01-16· cited 2×
- Grieco v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1928-01-18· cited 1×
- McRedmond v. Estate of Andrew MarianelliCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-06-16
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1878-02-18· cited 399×
- Cronan v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1870-03-15· cited 64×
- Wetherell v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court· 1892-01-18· cited 40×
- Wilson v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court· 1878-01-15· cited 23×
- Longwith v. RiggsIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-11-08· cited 20×
- Weer v. GandIllinois Supreme Court· 1878-01-15· cited 19×
- Steele v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-06-15· cited 17×
- Doyle v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court· 1859-04-15· cited 15×
- Woodward v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1879-06-24· cited 14×
- Kirby v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-03-21· cited 12×
- Fitzsimmons v. CassellIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-03-21· cited 12×
- Crisfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1880-12-17· cited 10×
- City of Chicago v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court· 1879-09-15· cited 8×
- Kaufman & Runge v. B. Alexander & Bro.Texas Supreme Court· 1880-06-04· cited 5×
- Tracey v. HaddenIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-06-15· cited 5×
- Pierce v. ShippeeIllinois Supreme Court· 1878-09-15· cited 4×
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. FaughtIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-06-10· cited 4×
- Commercial Bank v. BucknerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1846-11-15· cited 3×
- Green v. ChiltonMississippi Supreme Court· 1880-04-15· cited 2×
Other cases named Svanoe v. Jurgens
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.