Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 11/3/2014

Suzhen Meng v. Holder

Citations

  • 770 F.3d 1071
  • 2014 WL 5510901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “evidence of the possibility of future torture” is insufficient to show agency error
  • stating that an alien must show by a preponderance of the evidence that she is not barred from seeking asylum
  • “Past torture does not give rise to a presumption of future torture. Rather, it serves as evidence of the possibility of future torture.”
  • “Past torture does not give rise to a presumption of future torture. Rather, it serves as evidence of the possibility of future torture.”
  • persecutor bar applies if “(1) the alien [was] involved in acts of persecution; 3 Case: 18-60153 Document: 00514993897 Page: 4 Date Filed: 06/12/2019 No. 18-60153 (2
  • “Past torture does not give rise to a presumption of future torture.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carney, Raggi, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.