Skip to main content
· 12/21/2004

Sussman v. Mermer

Citations

  • 862 A.2d 572
  • 373 N.J. Super. 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a genuine dispute of material fact existed as to whether plaintiff, who was injured while exiting defendants’ home from the front porch, had ever used the front porch previously
  • enumerating the four-factors as “(1) the relationship of the parties, (2) the nature of the attendant risk, (3) the opportunity and ability to exercise care, and (4) the public interest in the proposed solution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Skillman, Parrillo and Grall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.