Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury could find that the placement of a “cat track” intended to smooth a traverse for novice skiers was unnecessarily dangerous and not an inherent risk
• noting that “the common-law classifications of persons on land should be applied flexibly in assessing the landowner’s general tort obligation to avoid foreseeable harm to others”
• acknowledging that warnings \might have reduced [a] hazard and thus 'removed' it for the purposes of the Ski Statute\
• applying invited error doctrine because defense counsel agreed to officer's testimony
• stating the invited error doctrine bars a litigant from arguing an error on appeal A-3676-17 34 \when that party urged the lower court to adopt the proposition now alleged to be error\
• applying invited error doctrine because defense counsel agreed to officer’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).