Skip to main content
· 6/2/1930

Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook

Citations

  • 281 U.S. 647
  • 50 S. Ct. 455
  • 74 L. Ed. 1091
  • 1930 U.S. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when a cession is accepted, the terms of the cession are determinative of the jurisdiction of both the federal government and the state within the enclave
  • Indian reservation-is not federal enclave because state civil and criminal laws still apply to non-Indians
  • Indian reservation is not federal enclave because state civil and criminal laws still apply to non-Indians

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Devanter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.