Surowiec v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s improper exclusion of defendant’s evidence of plaintiff’s intoxication as cause of motor vehicle accident justified grant of new trial but not judgment n.o.v.
• trial court should have allowed evidence of plaintiffs intoxication as a reasonable alternate cause of auto accident; with this evidence, new trial is justified because ‘two reasonable minds could differ as to the cause of the accident’
• car lurched forward and backward suddenly while driver was parallel parking
• car lurched forward and backward suddenly while driver was. parallel parking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).