Surowiec v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s improper exclusion of defendant’s evidence of plaintiff’s intoxication as cause of motor vehicle accident justified grant of new trial but not judgment n.o.v.
• trial court should have allowed evidence of plaintiffs intoxication as a reasonable alternate cause of auto accident; with this evidence, new trial is justified because ‘two reasonable minds could differ as to the cause of the accident’
• car lurched forward and backward suddenly while driver was parallel parking
• car lurched forward and backward suddenly while driver was. parallel parking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dansak v. Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-18· cited 51×
• Madonna v. Harley Davidson, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-25· cited 26×
• Coughlin, A., Aplt. v. Massaquoi, U.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-28· cited 12×
• Van Horn v. Reinhart Flynn Inc.
  Carbon County Court of Common Pleas· 2003-07-23· cited 1×
• Colyer v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
  Centre County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-05-04
• Madonna v. Harley-Davidson Inc.
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1997-03-25

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moure v. Raeuchle
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-21· cited 227×
• Broxie v. Household Finance Company
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 88×
• Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-20· cited 65×
• Roselli v. General Electric Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-25· cited 64×
• Ackerman v. Delcomico
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-12· cited 60×
• Morreale v. Prince
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-11-11· cited 55×
• BILLOW v. Farmers Trust Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-05-27· cited 52×
• Woodin v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-06· cited 24×
• Ducko v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-06· cited 24×
• Crosby v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-26· cited 23×
• Lonon v. Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack & General Battery Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-26· cited 18×
• Murray v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-11· cited 17×
• Brill v. Systems Resources, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-24· cited 17×
• Locke v. Claypool
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-08· cited 17×