Woodin v. JC Penney Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a product defect cannot be inferred in a freezer cord when it functioned flawlessly for eight years before catching fire
• recognizing that a product defect cannot be inferred in a freezer cord when it functioned flawlessly for eight years before catching fire
• recognizing that a product defect cannot be inferred in a freezer cord when it functioned flawlessly for eight years before catching fire
• recognizing that a product Reyna, 865 S.W.2d 925, 928 (Tex.1993). To raise a genuine defect cannot be inferred in a freezer cord when it functioned issue of material fact, however, the evidence must transcend flawlessly for eight years before catching fire
• inference of defect at time of sale not permitted from fact of fire alone when freezer functioned without incident for more than eight years, and there was no evidence of any defect
• discussing availability of malfunction theory in manufacturing defect case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).