Sunn v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that one of the factors to be analyzed in determining whether a statement qualifies as an excited utterance includes “whether the statement is self-serving”
• noting that one of the factors to be analyzed ' in determining whether a statement qualifies as an excited utterance includes “whether the statement is self-serving”
• relying on principles of pre-Code case in determining whether statement admissible under sections 90.803(1) and (2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beckman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-06· cited 21×
• Blandenburg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 10×
• J.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-05· cited 9×
• State v. Adams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-28· cited 3×
• JM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-05
• BRANDON HINCK v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-05
• Irizarry v. Value Rent-A-Car, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jano
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-05-05· cited 76×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-03· cited 48×
• Appell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-06-21· cited 19×