Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/8/1986
Sullivan v. State
Citations
- 701 S.W.2d 905
- 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that cross-examining owner’s value opinion is not enough; defense must offer controverting evidence
- providing that a non-owner must be qualified as to his knowledge of the value of the property to testify about fair market value
- establishing that a non-owner may testify as to the fair market value of property as long as the non-owner is qualified to speak to the value of the property
- establishing that a non-owner may testify as to the fair market value of property as long as the non-owner is qualified to speak to the value of the property
- noting that replacement cost has been used as means to determine fair market value, and owner of property is competent to testify as 7 to value of her own property
- distinguishing the requirements for admissibility of testimony concerning value from a non- owner of property as opposed to an owner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, McCORMICK, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-06· cited 96×
- Jimenez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-02-21· cited 46×
- Aitch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-12· cited 45×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-04-16· cited 40×
- Valdez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-06· cited 35×
- Gloria Sandone v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-01-17· cited 33×
- Ray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-01· cited 32×
- Holz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-22· cited 30×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-18· cited 24×
- SMILES v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-08-20· cited 20×
- Morales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-08-03· cited 20×
- McMillan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1988-06-30· cited 18×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-07-27· cited 18×
- Rivera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1994-09-29· cited 15×
- In the Matter of J.R.C.S., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2012-12-19· cited 15×
- McNiel v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-08-31· cited 10×
- Fernandez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-04-30· cited 9×
- York v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-12-17· cited 9×
- MaGee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-08-14· cited 9×
- Binnion v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-29· cited 8×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-03-09· cited 85×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-22· cited 82×
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 70×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-10-18· cited 60×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 31×
- De La O v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-11-13· cited 27×
- Nitcholas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-25· cited 26×
- Trammell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-24· cited 24×
- Senters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1956-05-30· cited 23×
- Israel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1953-04-08· cited 23×
- Barstow v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1968-05-29· cited 19×
- Ex parte HodgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1953-05-27· cited 6×
- Houston v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1982-05-20· cited 5×
- Houston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-31· cited 5×
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.