Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 676 S.W.2d 416
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a request for self-representation was timely when it was made after the jury was impaneled but before the reading of the indictment and before the presentation of any evidence by the State
  • finding request for self-representation made after jury impaneled was timely because no evidence had been presented to jury
  • finding request timely because no evidence had been presented to jury
  • finding request timely because no evidence had been presented to jury
  • assertion of right timely after impaneling of jury but before any evidence presented to jury
  • assertion of right timely after impaneling of jury but before any evidence presented to jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.