Sullivan v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that decisions to grant or deny parole or probation are not appealable because the parole board and the trial court have complete discretion to grant or deny parole or probation, respectively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kocontes v. McQuaid
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2010-01-29· cited 61×
• James Carnes v. Mary Elizabeth Carnes.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-10-07· cited 14×
• Witherow v. State Board of Parole Commissioners
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 13×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Nielsen
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-04-17· cited 208×
• Ex Parte the Alabama Great Southern R.R.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-12-01· cited 64×
• Ellard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-06-26· cited 64×
• Ex Parte Ballew
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-04-14· cited 58×
• O'BARR v. Feist
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1974-06-06· cited 55×
• Cruz v. Skelton
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-10-14· cited 52×
• Supry v. Bolduc
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1972-07-24· cited 38×
• Webster v. Byrd
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-07-25· cited 32×
• Pate v. Alabama Bd. of Pardons and Paroles
  M.D. Alabama· 1976-03-23· cited 23×
• Sellers v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-05-11· cited 19×
• Cole v. Star Tribune
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-07-14· cited 17×
• Thompson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-06-15· cited 15×
• Ex Parte Alabama Bd. of Pardons and Paroles
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-11-15· cited 13×
• Ex Parte Alabama Bd. of Pardons and Paroles
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-09-07· cited 7×