Supry v. Bolduc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing privilege for adjoining landowner’s defamatory statements about plaintiff to zoning board given landowner’s “private interest in the protection of her property to advance”
• recognizing privilege for adjoining landowner's defamatory statements about plaintiff to zoning board given landowner's \private interest in the protection of her property to advance\
• determining statements made during a public hearing were not absolutely privileged because the hearing did not have all the hallmarks of a judicial proceeding
• determining statements made during a public hearing were not absolutely privileged because the hearing did not have all the hallmarks of a judicial proceeding
• determining statements made during a public hearing were not absolutely privileged because the hearing did not have all the hallmarks of a judicial proceeding
• determining statements made during a public hearing were not absolutely privileged because the hearing did not have all the hallmarks of a judicial proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).