Skip to main content
· 2/15/1985

Sullivan v. Heckler

Citations

  • 602 F. Supp. 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court has mandamus jurisdiction to address claimant’s challenge to Appeals Council’s dismissal of allegedly timely request for review
  • AU’s denial of request for extension of time not subject to judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.