· 3/13/1979
Tennille G. Sheehan v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
Citations
- 593 F.2d 323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on Sanders to reverse a district court decision following Langford
- district court lacks jurisdiction to review Appeals Council denial of an extension of the period within which to file an administrative appeal of an administrative law judge’s denial of benefits
- “[T]he Supreme Court specifically held that § 405(h) prevents review of the Secretary’s decisions except as provided in § 405(g) of the Act.”
- “Under the Secretary’s regulations finality required for judicial review is achieved only after a hearing before an administrative law judge and, ordinarily, consideration by the Appeals Council.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lay, Bright, Harper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.