Suleiman v. Yunis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We begin our analysis with the basic premise that a ‘[fjailure to give notice of a hearing to the opposing party absent a true emergency deprives the opposing party of its right to. procedural due process.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hurst v. Hurst
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-10· cited 1×
• Tata v. Tata
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-09· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Beeler
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 36×
• Wilson v. Roseberry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-22· cited 28×
• Crippen v. Crippen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-01· cited 25×
• Gielchinsky v. Gielchinsky
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-01· cited 24×
• Loudermilk v. Loudermilk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-07· cited 21×
• Decker v. Lyle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-09· cited 18×
• Landingham v. Landingham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-20· cited 17×
• Hayman v. Hayman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-25· cited 11×
• Fee v. Usler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-31· cited 9×
• Antonetti v. Amato
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-24· cited 7×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 5×
• Department of Children & Families v. D.B.D.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-25· cited 4×
• Ashby v. Murray
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-15· cited 4×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-12· cited 3×
• R.P. v. Department of Children & Families
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-22· cited 1×