Sugrim v. Sugrim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that errors concerning evidentiary sufficiency that appear on the face of a final judgment are reviewable even if no transcript of the trial proceedings exists
• stating that without a transcript or statement of the evidence, an issue concerning evidentiary sufficiency is not reviewable but that \[a]n error which appears on the face of the final judgment\ is subject to review
• in a dissolution action, as in other civil litigation, an issue is properly before the court where raised by the pleadings or where raised and considered by the court without objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).