Suggs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant “cannot establish substantial harm or substantial potential for harm due to the lack of accomplice liability instructions because the evidence was sufficient to convict him as a principal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brian Ellis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-05-07
• Lei Gamble v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2025-03-27

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davenport
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-12· cited 209×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 186×
• Whitener v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 112×
• Davis v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-26· cited 107×
• Hampton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 61×
• Ortiz v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-22· cited 56×
• Kelly v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-01· cited 21×
• State v. Spencer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-26· cited 21×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-26· cited 6×
• Hightower v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-06· cited 5×
• Ballard v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-05-05· cited 2×
• State v. Herrell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-23· cited 1×