Su Yeun Kim v. Carter's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting \ Dean may have effectively overruled [the Second] [C]ircuit's precedent [in United States v. Chavez
• \[T]he charitable portion [of the trust] is exempt from the rule [against perpetuities].” citing Mercantile Banking & Trust Co. v. Showacre
• observing that, \although laws that restrict only commercial speech are content based
• \ `A statutory provision which is clear and unambiguous and plainly expresses the legislative intent will not be interpreted by the courts but will be given full force and effect.' Syl. Pt. 2
• \ `A statutory provision which is clear and unambiguous and plainly expresses the legislative intent will not be interpreted by the courts but will be given full force and effect.' Syl. Pt. 2
• \`\A statutory provision which is clear and unambiguous and plainly expresses the legislative intent will not be interpreted by the courts but will be given full force and effect.\ Syl. Pt. 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).