B. Sanfield, Incorporated v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no past or future injury in part because plaintiffs “sales rose during the months covered by its claims”
• finding false bargain price where jewelry store “lack[ed] any bona fide intent to 9 make transactions at the higher price”
• finding no past or future injury in part because plaintiff ’s “sales rose during the months covered by its claims”
• competitor “is not a public prosecutor” and must therefore “prove past or potential inju- ry”
• indirect competition requires showing of “past or 9 potential” injury
• indirect competition requires showing of “past or potential” injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).