Sturm v. TOC Retail, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a convenience store manager need not be physically present to supervise other employees where the manager scheduled work shift of subordinates, were on-call to address problems, and reviewed the workers' shift performance
• noting that “in most cases” the primary duty inquiry can be resolved “by simply deciding if the employee was ‘in charge’ ”
• noting that “in most cases” the primary duty inquiry can be resolved “by simply deciding if the employee was ‘in charge’”
• finding that the managers of a convenience store had management as their primary duty
• employee deemed exempt who performed nonexempt as well as exempt work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).