Stull v. Johnson
Citations
- 61 Pa. Super. 232
- 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 305
Syllabus
<p>Trial — Charge—Comment upon evidence — Father testifying against veracity of daughter.</p> <p>• A trial judge cannot be convicted of error in calling attention in a proper way to the unusual spectacle of a father testifying against the truth and veracity of his daughter, where the comments are made without misleading or controlling the jury.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Iart, Kepi, Oklady, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Trenler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ginder v. BachmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-10-10· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-10-07· cited 15×
- Fitzpatrick v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-05-25· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. ShultsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-05-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.