Skip to main content
· 10/11/1915

Stull v. Johnson

Citations

  • 61 Pa. Super. 232
  • 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 305

Syllabus

<p>Trial — Charge—Comment upon evidence — Father testifying against veracity of daughter.</p> <p>• A trial judge cannot be convicted of error in calling attention in a proper way to the unusual spectacle of a father testifying against the truth and veracity of his daughter, where the comments are made without misleading or controlling the jury.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Iart, Kepi, Oklady, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Trenler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.