Stuart v. Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “although joinder is permissible, the administration of justice is better served by keeping tort and divorce actions separate”
• rejecting a mandatory joinder requirement and holding that tort claims may be joined with divorce actions but do not have to be
• In Stuart, this court expressly adopted the reasoning of the court of appeals regarding the legal principles underlying claim preclusion. Stu art, 140 Wis. 2d at 460-64
• adopting language of intermediate Wisconsin appellate court
• adopting language of intermediate Wisconsin appellate court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-04-09· cited 129×
• Henriksen v. Cameron
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-03-24· cited 54×
• Hakkila v. Hakkila
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-03-21· cited 46×
• McGee v. McGee
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-12· cited 40×
• Christians v. Christians
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-05· cited 37×
• Hanlon v. Town of Milton
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-06-21· cited 34×
• G.A.W. v. D.M.W.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-13· cited 28×
• Ward v. Ward
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-10-05· cited 21×
• Slansky v. Slansky
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 19×
• McCulloh v. Drake
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2001-06-15· cited 19×
• Henry v. Henry
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 12×
• Doe v. Doe
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-06-29· cited 12×
• Lei Abbott v. Harlan Owens Williams, Jr.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-11-30· cited 11×
• Plankel v. Plankel
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-21· cited 10×
• Brinkman v. Brinkman
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-03-31· cited 9×
• Osborne v. Osborne
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-05-13· cited 5×
• Knafelc v. Dain Bosworth, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-01-12· cited 2×
• Gaw v. Dmw
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-13
• Regina Sutton Chennault v. Michael Douglas Chennault
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2018-02-21

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tevis v. Tevis
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-04-05· cited 146×
• Brown v. Brown
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-02-28· cited 84×
• Windauer v. O'CONNOR
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-17· cited 42×
• Dixon v. Dixon
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-06-02· cited 38×
• McNevin v. McNevin
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-03-30· cited 33×
• Lord v. Shaw
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-06-02· cited 26×
• Stuart v. Stuart
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-06-16· cited 25×
• Jackson v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-11-30· cited 14×
• Kemp v. Kemp
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-10-08· cited 8×