Skip to main content
· 1/20/2004

Strozyk v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

Citations

  • 358 F.3d 268
  • 2004 WL 78351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing district court‟s preemption holding and “leav[ing] the issue of whether or not the railroad met its duty of care, and the relevant standard, for the District Court and the fact finder on remand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rendell, Weis, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.