Skip to main content
· 6/19/2003

Peachlum v. City of York PA

Citations

  • 333 F.3d 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]onsiderations of ripeness are sufficiently important that the court is required to raise the issue sua sponte even though the parties do not.”
  • \[A] facial First Amendment challenge is not normally subject to administrative finality analysis under any circumstances.\
  • \We recognize that free speech may be suppressed and a concrete injury may occur merely as a result of the initiation of enforcement proceedings. We do not now hold that administrative finality applies in such cases.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry, Rosenn, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.