· 6/19/2003
Peachlum v. City of York PA
Citations
- 333 F.3d 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[C]onsiderations of ripeness are sufficiently important that the court is required to raise the issue sua sponte even though the parties do not.”
- \[A] facial First Amendment challenge is not normally subject to administrative finality analysis under any circumstances.\
- \We recognize that free speech may be suppressed and a concrete injury may occur merely as a result of the initiation of enforcement proceedings. We do not now hold that administrative finality applies in such cases.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barry, Rosenn, Pollak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.