Skip to main content
· 6/6/1988

Stroud v. Ward

Citations

  • 425 N.W.2d 490
  • 169 Mich. App. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because plaintiffs damages resulted from inadequate representation by defendant, claim is based on malpractice rather than breach of contract for statute of limitations purposes
  • retention of new counsel effectively terminated attorney-client relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cynar, Gribbs, Gillespie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.