Pantely v. Garris, Garris & Garris, PC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “law degree does not add to one’s awareness that perjury is immoral and illegal, any more than an accounting degree adds to one’s awareness that tax fraud is immoral and illegal”
• \A law degree does not add to one's awareness that perjury is immoral and illegal[.]\
• “in pari delicto, as a common-law doctrine, expresses the principle that wrongdoers ought each to bear the untoward consequences of their wrongdoing without legal recompense or recourse”
• client committed perjury on advice of attorney and could not recover in malpractice claim
• “In pari delicto, as a common law doctrine, expresses the principle that wrongdoers ought each to bear the untoward consequences of their 4 See Demski v Petlick, 309 Mich App 404, 441; 873 NW2d 596 (2015
• “In pari delicto, as a common law doctrine, expresses the principle that wrongdoers ought each to bear the untoward consequences of their 4 See Demski v Petlick, 309 Mich App 404, 441; 873 NW2d 596 (2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).