Strauss v. Allentown
Citations
- 215 Pa. 96
- 63 A. 1073
- 1906 Pa. LEXIS 739
Syllabus
<p>Waters — Flow of surface water — Municipalities—Damnum absque injuria.</p> <p>A city is not liable to a property owner for the increased flow of surface water over or onto his property, arising merely from the changes in the character of the surface produced by the opening of streets, building of houses, etc., in the ordinary and regular course of the expansion of the city.</p> <p>Every man has the right to the natural, proper and profitable use of his own land, and if in the course of such use without negligence unavoidable loss is brought upon his neighbor, it is damnum absque injuria. This rule applies to municipalities as well as to individuals.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “there is no sound reason why the same rule should not apply to municipalities as to individuals”
- “The same rule must apply to the natural and proper development of a municipality”
- \The same rule must apply to the natural and proper development of a municipality\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Chibe, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-11-14· cited 126×
- Chamberlin v. CiaffoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-04-22· cited 41×
- Rau v. Wilden Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-03-22· cited 33×
- Rielly v. StephensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-10-05· cited 32×
- Laform v. Bethlehem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-18· cited 30×
- Piekarski v. Club Overlook Estates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-12· cited 19×
- MD Mall Assocs., LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-12-22· cited 9×
- Bretz v. Central Bucks School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-21· cited 8×
- Reinhart v. Lancaster Area Refuse AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-09-12· cited 8×
- Breiner v. C & P Home Builders, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-07-16· cited 7×
- Woodbine Auto, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityE.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-06-16· cited 5×
- Clouse v. CrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-10-08· cited 4×
- City of Globe v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court· 1921-12-10· cited 4×
- Taylor v. Harrison Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-07-21· cited 2×
- Tom Clark Chevrolet, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-14· cited 2×
- Barrett v. Minersville BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-02-26· cited 2×
- White v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-04-17· cited 2×
- Flaherty v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1916-07-18· cited 2×
- Mountain Water Supply Co. v. Sagamore Coal Co.Fayette County Court· 1922-12-26· cited 2×
- Schweriner v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-12-12· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kauffman v. GriesemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1856-07-01· cited 55×
- Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-04-09· cited 48×
- Stork v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-03-12· cited 45×
- Collins v. Chartiers V. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-01-06· cited 42×
- Carr v. Northern LibertiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1860-07-01· cited 31×
- Fair v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1879-03-10· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.