Stovall v. Harms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the absence of unusual circumstances, a general practitioner who referred a patient to a psychiatric specialist had no duty to advise patient of risks and dangers incident to psychiatric treatment
• in the absence of unusual circumstances, a general practitioner who referred a patient to a psychiatric specialist had no duty to advise patient of risks and dangers incident to psychiatric treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).