Sixth Circuit· 5/7/1982
Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department
Citations
- 679 F.2d 541
- 28 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1491
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19450
- 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,679
Judges: Duncan, Keith, Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court· 1989-08-11· cited 565×
- Williams v. VukovichSixth Circuit· 1983-11-04· cited 286×
- Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentFifth Circuit· 1983-08-30· cited 131×
- Berger v. HecklerSecond Circuit· 1985-08-26· cited 104×
- 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 465, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,497 Hanson Bratton v. City of Detroit, and Guardians of Michigan, InterveningSixth Circuit· 1983-03-29· cited 75×
- 57 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 902, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,141 Anne G. Stuart v. Francis M. Roache, as He is Police Commissioner of the City of BostonFirst Circuit· 1991-12-23· cited 68×
- Vanguards of Cleveland v. City of Cleveland, and Local Number 93, I.A.F.F., Afl-Cio, Intervenor-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1985-04-22· cited 67×
- 34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1009, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,311 Larry Williams v. The City of New Orleans, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1984-04-23· cited 66×
- Aiken v. City of MemphisSixth Circuit· 1994-10-06· cited 62×
- Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1992-08-19· cited 56×
- In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2001-03-08· cited 52×
- Youngblood v. DalzellSixth Circuit· 1991-02-14· cited 38×
- Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.S.D. Ohio· 1984-06-22· cited 32×
- Smith v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaSixth Circuit· 1982-08-03· cited 30×
- Heath v. DeCourcySixth Circuit· 1993-04-30· cited 26×
- United States v. State Of OregonNinth Circuit· 1990-08-27· cited 24×
- Heath v. De CourcySixth Circuit· 1989-11-03· cited 24×
- Washington Hospital v. WhiteThird Circuit· 1989-11-24· cited 20×
- United Black Firefighters Ass'n v. City of AkronSixth Circuit· 1992-09-30· cited 19×
- In re Art Materials Antitrust LitigationN.D. Ohio· 1983-11-18· cited 17×
Cites
87 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 3,317×
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court· 1974-02-19· cited 3,057×
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 2,178×
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court· 1978-06-28· cited 1,665×
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 1,479×
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1932-05-02· cited 1,171×
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,143×
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1982-04-05· cited 841×
- Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 821×
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 812×
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 789×
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 781×
- Cotton v. HintonFifth Circuit· 1977-09-30· cited 455×
- Aldens, Inc. v. KaneSupreme Court· 1976-04-19· cited 423×
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-03-19· cited 410×
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 364×
- The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanySixth Circuit· 1976-05-07· cited 249×
- Zane v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-21· cited 211×
Other cases named Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.