Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/14/2017
Storm v. Martin
Citations
- 540 S.W.3d 795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Martin got nearly the exact jury instruction he proposed, and did not object to the instruction in the trial court. Martin cannot now make the unpreserved argument that error occurred in these instructions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vanmeter, Venters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. HornungKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 148×
- Lewis v. Bledsoe Surface Mining Co.Kentucky Supreme Court· 1990-11-08· cited 87×
- Olfice, Inc. v. WilkeyKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 48×
- Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. SmithKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 44×
- Saint Joseph Healthcare, Inc. v. ThomasKentucky Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 44×
- Sutton v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-11-10· cited 37×
- Savage v. Three Rivers Medical CenterKentucky Supreme Court· 2012-10-25· cited 31×
- Knox County v. HammonsKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-03-19· cited 17×
- Henson v. KleinKentucky Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 17×
- Nissan Motor Co. v. MaddoxKentucky Supreme Court· 2015-09-24· cited 10×
- Wales v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-12-21· cited 7×
- Fleming v. EQT Gathering, LLCKentucky Supreme Court· 2017-02-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.