Sparkman v. Consol Energy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The Kentucky Supreme Court] has never strayed from the Restatement (Second) of Torts when analyzing tortious interference claims and does not elect to do so today.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Estate of Joshua Naeve, By Its Administrators, Thad Neave and Nancye Naeve, Thad Naeve, Individually and Nancye Naeve, Individually v. FBL Financial Group, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2019-07-03
• In the Matter of the Certified Question: Diamond Quality, Inc. v. Dana Light Axle Products, LLC
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2025-04-24

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 230×
• National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Hornung
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 148×
• Waste Conversion Systems, Inc. v. Greenstone Industries, Inc.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 32×
• Phil Crowley Steel Corporation v. Sharon Steel Corporation and Nvf Company
  Eighth Circuit· 1986-01-29· cited 24×
• T.P. Leasing Corp. v. Baker Leasing Corp.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-07-20· cited 21×
• MGP Ingredients, Inc. v. Mars, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 2006-12-07· cited 7×
• Storm v. Martin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-12-14· cited 6×

Other cases named Sparkman v. Consol Energy, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Sparkman v. Consol Energy, Inc.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 5×