D.C. Circuit· 5/24/1943
Stone v. Stone
Citations
- 136 F.2d 761
- 78 U.S. App. D.C. 5
- 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In an action which challenges the conduct of a public officer, a presumption of law is indulged in his favor that his official duties were properly performed”
- “In an action which challenges the conduct of a public officer, a presumption of law is indulged in his favor that his official duties were properly performed.”
- “In an action which challenges the conduct of a public officer, a presumption of law is indulged in his favor that his official duties were properly performed.”
- trier of fact may not disregard “positive testimony, uncontradicted, and not inherently improbable”
- husband concealed fact he suffered from veneral disease
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Groner, Miller, Edgerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edouard Legille v. C. Marshall Dann, Commissioner of PatentsD.C. Circuit· 1976-08-24· cited 102×
- Latif v. ObamaD.C. Circuit· 2011-10-14· cited 37×
- Myers v. GaitherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1967-08-10· cited 36×
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardFirst Circuit· 1976-06-10· cited 26×
- Belcon Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-12· cited 24×
- Latif v. ObamaD.C. Circuit· 2011-11-09· cited 22×
- Schroeder v. SchroederDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1957-07-01· cited 21×
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. Office of Science and Technology PolicyDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-13· cited 21×
- Hamilton v. Hojeij Branded Food, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12· cited 19×
- Texas Co. v. HoodFifth Circuit· 1947-05-09· cited 13×
- Perlman v. Chal-Bro., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1945-08-24· cited 9×
- Pueblo De Zia v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-04-17· cited 8×
- Wolfgang, Prince of Hesse v. BurrowsD.C. Circuit· 1950-04-17· cited 7×
- Sullivan v. North American Accident Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-04-21· cited 7×
- In re Adoption of a MinorD.C. Circuit· 1943-06-14· cited 7×
- Koehne v. PriceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1949-10-13· cited 6×
- Anderson Co. v. Trico Products Corp.W.D. New York· 1958-01-17· cited 5×
- Lake v. LakeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-03· cited 3×
- United States v. HarveyE.D. Louisiana· 1966-02-04· cited 3×
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1957-04-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.