Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/24/1943

Stone v. Stone

Citations

  • 136 F.2d 761
  • 78 U.S. App. D.C. 5
  • 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In an action which challenges the conduct of a public officer, a presumption of law is indulged in his favor that his official duties were properly performed”
  • “In an action which challenges the conduct of a public officer, a presumption of law is indulged in his favor that his official duties were properly performed.”
  • “In an action which challenges the conduct of a public officer, a presumption of law is indulged in his favor that his official duties were properly performed.”
  • trier of fact may not disregard “positive testimony, uncontradicted, and not inherently improbable”
  • husband concealed fact he suffered from veneral disease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Groner, Miller, Edgerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.