Hamilton v. Hojeij Branded Food, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that factfinder’s order “cannot stand” because it “failed to include adequately in [their] calculus [the] uncontradicted testimony, and the documentary evidence supporting that testimony”
• “It is incumbent upon us, in this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).