Skip to main content
· 4/4/1898

Stockham v. Stockham

Citations

  • 185 Pa. 337
  • 39 A. 950
  • 1898 Pa. LEXIS 715

Syllabus

<p>Partition — Equity—Vacation, of street.</p> <p>An answer to a bill in equity in partition is insufficient which, after admitting the facts averred in the bill, alleges that the value of the property in suit has been greatly depreciated by an ordinance of the city vacating the street upon which it is located, and that “ the defendants suggest, as the property cannot be divided, that it would not be advisable, and it would be highly inequitable and very prejudicial to their interests, and' to the interests of all parties interested, to enforce partition or distribution of the property aforesaid.”</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, Pee, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.