Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/18/1968
Christenson v. Christenson
Citations
- 162 N.W.2d 194
- 281 Minn. 507
- 1968 Minn. LEXIS 1035
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we will construe rules of procedure “to effectuate [the] purpose” of the rules
- discovery rules and privilege against self-incrimination available in divorce action, as in any other civil action
- discovery rules and privilege against self-incrimination available in divorce action, as in any other civil action
- court required plaintiff who invoked the Fifth Amendment in a divorce action to waive the privilege or have his case dismissed
- plaintiff required to waive privilege against self-incrimination or have divorce action dismissed
- plaintiff required to waive privilege against self-incrimination or have divorce action dismissed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court· 1985-03-06· cited 198×
- Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-07-26· cited 108×
- The Black Panther Party v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1981-07-08· cited 106×
- Marriage of DeLa Rosa v. DeLa RosaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-08-28· cited 85×
- General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Eighth Circuit· 1973-07-30· cited 70×
- Griffith v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-10-12· cited 65×
- Marriage of Kornberg v. KornbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-01-19· cited 45×
- Felsman v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-04-27· cited 45×
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-08· cited 38×
- Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-11-19· cited 30×
- Galante v. STEEL CITY NAT'L BK. OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-03· cited 29×
- Conkling v. ConklingSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-04-09· cited 26×
- Tug Valley Pharmacy, LLC v. All BelowWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-05-13· cited 26×
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-12· cited 25×
- Pulawski v. PulawskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-07-15· cited 23×
- In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-09-13· cited 19×
- City of St. Petersburg v. HoughtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-08-11· cited 17×
- Brown v. AmesD. Minnesota· 1972-04-18· cited 15×
- Penn Communications Specialties, Inc. v. HessE.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-01-30· cited 14×
- Larson v. Independent School District No. 314Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-09-19· cited 12×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-04-28· cited 735×
- Franklin v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1955-11-14· cited 84×
- United States v. AppelS.D. New York· 1913-06-15· cited 68×
- Stockham v. StockhamSupreme Court of Florida· 1964-10-21· cited 60×
- Levine v. BornsteinNew York Supreme Court· 1958-04-10· cited 57×
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-03-09· cited 53×
- Annest v. AnnestWashington Supreme Court· 1956-05-31· cited 37×
- Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1959-03-13· cited 32×
- Wanek v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1899-11-17· cited 31×
- Bishop v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia· 1924-01-24· cited 24×
- Snyker v. SnykerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-10-14· cited 21×
- Boldt v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-10-13· cited 16×
- Lund v. LundDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-03-25· cited 11×
- Lipman v. BechhoeferSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1918-11-29· cited 11×
- Nuckols v. NuckolsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-09-09· cited 6×
- Stockham v. StockhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-12-04· cited 5×
- Rhodes v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court· 1965-05-21· cited 4×
Other cases named Christenson v. Christenson
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.