Stirtan v. Blethen
Citations
- 79 Wash. 10
- 139 P. 618
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1133
Syllabus
<p>Contkacts — Legality of Object — Public Policy — Elections^Iufluenging Recall. A secret contract employing an agent who, without disclosing the principal, was to hire an office, hold public meetings, hire canvassers and circulate petitions to procure a recall election of certain officials, is contrary to public policy and void!; the secrecy enjoined being a conclusive badge of corrupt motive.</p> <p>Same — Effect of Illegality — Remedies. Where a secret contract employing an agent to procure a recall election was void as against public policy, the agent cannot recover for moneys expended as upon an executed independent implied contract of deposit, where, to make a case, plaintiff must rely upon the illegal contract itself; since the law will leave the parties where it finds them.</p>
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Conifer Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-03-29· cited 67×
- Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court· 1921-06-10· cited 19×
- Ferguson-Hendrix Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-08· cited 17×
- Dodson v. McCurninSupreme Court of Iowa· 1917-01-15· cited 10×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Frye & Bruhn, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1914-09-26· cited 7×
- State ex rel. McCauley v. GilliamWashington Supreme Court· 1914-08-12· cited 6×
- Tomkins v. Seattle Construction & Dry Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1917-05-23· cited 5×
- Moser v. PantagesWashington Supreme Court· 1917-04-30· cited 3×
- Northwest Wholesale, Inc. v. Pac-O Fruit, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-09-04
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1901-12-24· cited 51×
- Samuels v. OliverIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-10-31· cited 33×
- Howell ex rel. Jones v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia· 1847-07-15· cited 30×
- Pfeuffer v. MaltbyTexas Supreme Court· 1881-03-11· cited 26×
- Hoffman v. McMullenNinth Circuit· 1897-10-04· cited 18×
- Sweeney v. McLeodOregon Supreme Court· 1887-10-17· cited 12×
- Sussman v. PorterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey· 1905-05-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.