Stinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State properly allowed to cross-examine wife, who testified for defendant-husband, as to whether she had previously been convicted for same offense of which defendant stood accused.
• State properly allowed to cross-examine wife, who testified for defendant-husband, as to whether she had previously been convicted for same offense of which defendant stood accused.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waters v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-05-30· cited 50×
• Pack v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-11-27· cited 25×
• Hooper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-03-29· cited 18×
• Mayben v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-06-18· cited 2×
• Downs v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1970-02-05

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1953-04-16· cited 11×
• Duckett v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1952-05-27· cited 11×
• Duckett v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1952-08-27· cited 11×
• Conley v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1957-01-10· cited 9×
• Stinson v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1962-03-13· cited 5×
• Houston v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1957-03-07· cited 4×
• Jemison v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1960-05-19· cited 4×