Stinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State properly allowed to cross-examine wife, who testified for defendant-husband, as to whether she had previously been convicted for same offense of which defendant stood accused.
• State properly allowed to cross-examine wife, who testified for defendant-husband, as to whether she had previously been convicted for same offense of which defendant stood accused.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waters v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-05-30· cited 50×
• Pack v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-11-27· cited 25×
• Hooper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-03-29· cited 18×
• Stinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1962-06-21· cited 5×
• Mayben v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-06-18· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1916-12-21· cited 40×
• Johnson v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1916-06-30· cited 6×