Stinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the defendant is proved to be the perpetrator of another drug crime and the facts of that crime are sufficiently similar or connected to the facts of the crime charged, the separate crime will be admissible to prove identity, motive, plan, scheme, bent of mind, or course of conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Buckholts v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-01-11· cited 5×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-05-12· cited 5×
• Blance v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-05-12

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carroll v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-01· cited 827×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-10-29· cited 203×
• Sultenfuss v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-11-23· cited 41×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-11-13· cited 30×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-11· cited 23×
• Burgess v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-04-13· cited 17×
• Wilburn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-17· cited 15×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-10-04· cited 13×
• Guild v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-12· cited 13×
• Roberson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-01-14· cited 12×
• Sutton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-09-13· cited 10×
• West v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-02-22· cited 9×
• Tutman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-10-25· cited 5×