· 8/26/1963
Stilley v. Tinsley
Citations
- 385 P.2d 677
- 153 Colo. 66
- 1963 Colo. LEXIS 285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that statutes can impose procedural requirements on applications for habeas corpus
- sentence not within statutory limitations is not merely erroneous but void
- sentence not within statutory limitations is not merely erroneous but void
- district attorney must appear on behalf of the People in criminal proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.